Helping a loved one who is experiencing a severe mental illness, especially someone who may not realize they are sick, is one of the greatest gifts you can give. For some, it may mean the difference between life and tragedy. ~ Treatment Advocacy Center
(May 7, 2014) Our neighbor Maryland has long been among the very worst states in the union for those who cannot seek or agree to essential treatment for their severe mental illness. Marylanders in this condition (and the families who love them) currently face a tragic triple whammy:
1. A hospital commitment standard requiring a finding of “danger to life or safety,” which is often interpreted to slam the hospital doors on anyone who doesn’t appear imminently violent or suicidal;
2. The notorious “Kelly Decision” of 2007, in which the Maryland Court of Appeals ruled that a patient committed to a mental hospital who refuses medication cannot be medicated over objection without evidence that the person poses a danger while in the hospital, irrespective of the danger the person would pose in the community if released in his or her current unmedicated state;
3. The lack of an assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) law to help those caught in the revolving doors of the mental health and criminal justice systems to survive safely in the community. (Only four other states share this dubious distinction.)
With the strokes of several pens yesterday morning, Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley gave hope for a brighter day ahead. The governor signed two bills championed in this year’s legislative session by the Treatment Advocacy Center and our indefatigable partners in NAMI-Maryland.
One bill, HB 592/SB 620, nullifies the Kelly decision (effective October 1) by amending the state law interpreted by the court. The new language makes explicit that a committed patient may be medicated over objection if a review panel finds the patient’s mental illness symptoms cause dangerousness in the hospital, caused the dangerousness that led to commitment, or would cause dangerousness if the person were released.
The second bill, HB1267/SB882, represents progress towards addressing the two other glaring flaws in Maryland’s treatment laws. It directs the state’s Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DHMH) to convene a work group to examine AOT and deliver to the legislature by November 1, 2014 “a proposal for a program that … best serves individuals with mental illness who are at high risk for disruptions in the continuity of care.” It further directs DHMH to “evaluate the dangerousness standard for involuntary admissions and emergency evaluations of individuals with mental disorders, including … how the standard should be clarified[.]” (DHMH is already on record acknowledging the state’s need for both AOT and a consistent, more flexible interpretation of “danger to life or safety.”)
For now, we’ll say “one down, two to go,” with optimism that by this time next year, Maryland will stand proudly among the best states in meeting the needs of those whose anosognosia puts voluntary mental health care out of reach. We offer heartfelt thanks and kudos to the Maryland lawmakers who this year carried the mantle of this too-often-voiceless population: Senator Dolores Kelly and Delegate Dan Morhaim of Baltimore County, and Senator Mac Middleton and Delegate Peter Murphy of Charles County.
Karen Easter, Mental Health Advocate for Assisted Outpatient Treatment